Package home | Report new bug | New search | Development Roadmap Status: Open | Feedback | All | Closed Since Version 1.32.0

Bug #15875 Bug diff vs bug comments problem
Submitted: 2009-02-03 20:14 UTC
From: doconnor Assigned: doconnor
Status: Closed Package: pearweb
PHP Version: Irrelevant OS:
Roadmaps: (Not assigned)    
Subscription  
Comments Add Comment Add patch


Anyone can comment on a bug. Have a simpler test case? Does it work for you on a different platform? Let us know! Just going to say 'Me too!'? Don't clutter the database with that please !
Your email address:
MUST BE VALID
Solve the problem : 38 - 20 = ?

 
 [2009-02-03 20:14 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
Description: ------------ Regression: If you change a bug's status and provide a comment, the text diff (which is awesome) clobbers the comment. Test script: --------------- Expected result: ---------------- Actual result: --------------

Comments

 [2009-02-03 19:53 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
Alright, testing showed that strrpos() did surprising things. I've committed a fix in CVS for this.
 [2009-02-03 19:53 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
-Status: Open +Status: Closed -Assigned To: +Assigned To: doconnor
This bug has been fixed in CVS. If this was a documentation problem, the fix will appear on pear.php.net by the end of next Sunday (CET). If this was a problem with the pear.php.net website, the change should be live shortly. Otherwise, the fix will appear in the package's next release. Thank you for the report and for helping us make PEAR better.
 [2009-02-03 20:36 UTC] doconnor (Daniel O'Connor)
This looks suspicious: output_note() // This has to be done so we don't wordwrap the changeset part again $needle = strrpos($comment, 'div>'); $fix = substr($comment, $needle, strlen($comment)); $status = substr($comment, 0, $needle); $comment = htmlspecialchars(wordwrap($fix, 72, "\n", true), ENT_QUOTES, 'ISO-8859-15', false); $comment = $status . $comment; $comment = make_ticket_links(addlinks($comment)); echo $comment; basically, the generate changeset and comment code parts are fine, but the above code isn't immediately clear to me